From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Date: | 2011-07-22 18:21:53 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZCc9tfypMNvpVz0kuGuz__nDo0OvfgHQkzFFyE-NjpWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I am not neccessarily looking to include it in our tarball. What I asked
> was:
>
> Assuming the code actually makes this patch easier, do we:
>
> A. Pull in the code into the main tree
> B. Instead have it as a requirement via configure?
Well, both ways are going to cause a certain number of problems.
Pulling it into the tree means we've got to maintain it forever;
requiring it via configure means that everyone who packages PostgreSQL
now has to include that library if they want to include PostgreSQL.
> I am not arguing one way or the other. I am trying to find the best
> solution. I personally think you are handwaving if you think we can build
> out a robust parser in a couple of hours.
I respect your opinion, but, in this case, I disagree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-07-22 18:22:09 | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-07-22 18:09:26 | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |