| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Date: | 2015-03-09 16:59:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ97pjqQNn+yaS2Th=Eo8+YVOBFC9OsK5QbTUWs3GtsnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I think it is ridiculous to post on the bad/good/timing of a patch
> submission unless there is a case being made that the process isn't actually
> being followed. I don't see that here.
The CommitFest deadline was three weeks ago and I think it's
abundantly clear that Tom is not submitting this for the June
CommitFest. If that wasn't clear from his initial post, his follow-up
points have removed any doubt on that point.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-03-09 17:03:02 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-09 16:54:44 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |