From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Date: | 2017-12-01 19:04:37 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ8rLKD2cAUkn8ftmqSHPvRdGgod5DzjXHB4GyE-0iQNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> David Q1:
> postgres=# explain analyse execute ab_q1 (3,3); --const
> QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Append (cost=0.00..43.90 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.006..0.006
> rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on ab_a3_b3 (cost=0.00..43.90 rows=1 width=8) (actual
> time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1)
> Filter: ((a = 3) AND (b = 3))
> Planning time: 0.588 ms
> Execution time: 0.043 ms
> (5 rows)
I think the EXPLAIN ANALYZE input should show something attached to
the Append node so that we can tell that partition pruning is in use.
I'm not sure if that is as simple as "Run-Time Partition Pruning: Yes"
or if we can give a few more useful details.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-01 19:08:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-01 19:02:59 | Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench |