| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |
| Date: | 2014-06-17 16:41:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ8iWw0XstPm5PLPyeRgAjaMk7PT0EXz4qZnj5nx5pKsA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 11:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Yeah. To recap, the failure mode is that if the master crashes and
>> restarts, the transaction becomes visible in the master even though it
>> was never replicated.
>
> Wouldn't another pg_clog bit for the transaction be able to sort that out?
How?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-17 16:43:19 | Re: 9.5 CF1 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-17 16:40:35 | Re: WAL replay bugs |