Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Date: 2017-08-18 19:00:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ8Pu6tvSk0TmyzZZUdCVtJuqDR25FEoxJfJF1=yo0sMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:58 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> OK, but I was trying to make it very clear that this backup method only
> works on a primary. If you think the text is in the first paragraph is
> enough then I'm willing to go with that, though.

Yeah, I think the text is enough.

> Since the exclusive method only works on a primary...

Oh, right. Duh.

If you update the patch I'll apply it to 11 and 10.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vesa-Matti J Kari 2017-08-18 19:15:28 Re: HISTIGNORE for psql
Previous Message David Steele 2017-08-18 18:58:38 Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior