From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
Date: | 2014-01-15 18:36:11 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ8FDjB7sYWfSjHyAV6jUbmpQy=TnMe5JPPo1x+uRf=zA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> * Maybe we should rename names like pause_at_recovery_target to
>>> recovery_pause_at_target? Since we already force everyone to bother
>>> changing their setup...
>>
>> i don't have a problem with this, anyone else? if no one speaks i will
>> do what Andres suggests
>>
>
> Actually Michael had objected to this idea but i forgot about that...
> so i will wait for some consensus (my personal opinion is that
> Michael's argument is a good one)
I prefer the current name. It's more like the way English is spoken.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-01-15 18:36:14 | Re: tests for client programs |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-01-15 18:34:32 | Re: drop duplicate buffers in OS |