From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pradeep Kumar <spradeepkumar29(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Possible Bug in relation_open |
Date: | 2024-05-21 14:44:23 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ7ZrktneZ9tuu0SMv7ZCM=Zni1OPQKWmv71Q2ZC97PbA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 9:58 AM Pradeep Kumar <spradeepkumar29(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If the user tries to open the relation in RangeVar and NoLock mode calling table_openrv(relation, NoLock), it will internally call relation_openrv()-->relation_open(). In relation_open() we checking the Assert(lockmode >= NoLock && lockmode < MAX_LOCKMODES); , here we expecting the lockmode is NoLock or greater than that, but in same function again we checking this assert case Assert(lockmode != NoLock || IsBootstrapProcessingMode() || CheckRelationLockedByMe(r, AccessShareLock, true)); , here we are expecting (lockmode != NoLock) , so why are there two cases that contradict? and What if the user tries to open the relation in NoLock mode? and that will definitely cause the assert failure, Suppose the user who writes some extension and reads some relation oid that is constant, and wants to acquire NoLock?, need some clarification on this.
You need to acquire a lock. Otherwise, the relcache entry could change
underneath you while you're accessing it, which would result in
PostgreSQL crashing.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-05-21 15:04:04 | Re: zlib detection in Meson on Windows broken? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2024-05-21 14:24:05 | Re: zlib detection in Meson on Windows broken? |