| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation |
| Date: | 2019-03-27 21:27:22 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ6=1nqsE_hqfBqGFNedPkTV-VqL5gw9Jz6ivogBgTQxg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:35 PM Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I almost have the same view as Sawada-san. The reloption vacuum_shrink_enabled is a positive name and follows the naming style of other reloptions. I hope this matches the style you have in mind.
You're both right and I'm wrong.
However, I think it would be better to stick with the term 'truncate'
which is widely-used already, rather than introducing a new term.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-03-27 21:28:15 | Re: Should the docs have a warning about pg_stat_reset()? |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2019-03-27 21:22:18 | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |