From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+ |
Date: | 2011-08-04 18:43:41 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ5cPBi=hrev9m=7f7=gAQGgvkfEdMehVb=BcVRwX+6Jw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-07-27 at 18:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Also, while it may be true that we haven't used the term specifically
>> in SQL sypnoses, it's been extensively used in other parts of the
>> documentation, in the names of system functions such as
>> pg_relation_size(),
>
> Well, that thing is just the pinnacle of silliness, because we have
> pg_relation_size() and pg_table_size(), which have confusingly different
> behaviors.
Yeah, I just got flummoxed by that yesterday. Still, the name's out there...
>> and in user-visible error messages (cd
>> src/backend/po; git grep relation), so I think you may be trying to
>> close the barn door after the horse has got out.
>
> No, I'm trying to catch the horse. ;-)
Fair enough, but I think you're not running fast enough (yet).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-04 18:59:11 | Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+ |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-08-04 18:30:56 | Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+ |