Re: extensible options syntax for replication parser?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: extensible options syntax for replication parser?
Date: 2021-10-05 16:56:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ5Hwc9dGuG1Uwruty7K7kETS18_2ADr4y_=rJ5Z_oVKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:15 AM tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> It would be great if we throw an error rather than silently ignoring
> this parameter , I opened a separate email for this
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAC6VRoY3SAFeO7kZ0EOVC6mX%3D1ZyTocaecTDTh209W20KCC_aQ%40mail.gmail.com

Hearing no further comments, I've gone ahead and committed these
patches. I'm still slightly nervous that I may have missed some issue,
but I think at this point having the patches in the tree is more
likely to turn it up than any other course of action.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2021-10-05 16:56:33 Re: Triage on old commitfest entries
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-10-05 16:41:27 Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations