Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Date: 2017-03-01 09:18:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ1dkA2koOWEZvqwDbpVsy1JZam+1BjNQpAJ-cBdgfTOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, actually those were added later in Enable-WAL-for-Hash* patch,
> but I think as this patch is standalone, so we should not remove it
> from their existing usage, I have added those back and rebased the
> remaining patches.

Great, thanks. 0001 looks good to me now, so committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-01 09:24:38 Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-01 09:16:56 Re: timeouts in PostgresNode::psql