Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Date: 2017-08-31 19:51:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ1QVB5Re9=X4Nvh8tESdONdUchi+=Z7QPZg0-Hpyv3Mw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Here are the patches revised a bit. I have esp changed the variable
> names and arguments to reflect their true role in the functions. Also
> updated prologue of expand_single_inheritance_child() to mention
> "has_child". Let me know if those changes look good.

Sure. Committed as you have it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-31 20:02:20 sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-31 19:49:19 bgw_type (was Re: Why does logical replication launcher set application_name?)