From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
Date: | 2017-08-31 19:51:20 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ1QVB5Re9=X4Nvh8tESdONdUchi+=Z7QPZg0-Hpyv3Mw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Here are the patches revised a bit. I have esp changed the variable
> names and arguments to reflect their true role in the functions. Also
> updated prologue of expand_single_inheritance_child() to mention
> "has_child". Let me know if those changes look good.
Sure. Committed as you have it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-31 20:02:20 | sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-31 19:49:19 | bgw_type (was Re: Why does logical replication launcher set application_name?) |