Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Regina Obe <r(at)pcorp(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date: 2023-08-01 19:59:55
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ1GT8xSfLZ-j1L8hon=qhTM6qrWFWinsTC1wkw85i_UQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 3:23 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> I don't disagree with that, but there is nothing preventing that discussion to
> continue here or on other threads. The fact that consensus is that far away
> and no patch that applies exist seems to me to indicate that a new CF entry is
> a better option than pushing forward.

Fair point, thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2023-08-01 20:07:24 Re: How to build a new grammer for pg?
Previous Message Regina Obe 2023-08-01 19:59:53 RE: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames