| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Christophe Pettus <christophe(dot)pettus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Date: | 2018-01-13 02:42:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ+jgzR9XETuopFcBJij=3nO17t3YctLS9VaM+qm2hfUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> OTOH, it seems quite likely that we'll add more transaction-lifetime
> shared data (e.g. combocid), so building per-xact infrastructure
> actually seems like a good idea.
Sure, but there's no urgency about it. Particularly if the first cut
at this is implemented using dshash, moving the dshash to a different
DSA with a different lifespan later should be easy.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2018-01-14 10:33:22 | BUG #15009: connection to server |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-01-12 22:06:12 | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-13 03:39:09 | Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number of relations |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-01-13 02:25:55 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |