From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE |
Date: | 2014-01-02 12:53:45 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ+Vk54z8K_yE0ufDSB8uhcuUh_Ri=1Z+CS0DiP4hdoBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>> 1. PromiseTupleInsertionLockAcquire(<my xid>)
>> 2. Insert heap tuple
>> 3. Insert index tuples
>> 4. Check if conflict happened. Kill the already-inserted tuple on conflict.
>> 5. PromiseTupleInsertionLockRelease(<my xid>)
>>
>> IOW, the only change to the current patch is that you acquire the new kind
>> of lock before starting the insertion, and you release it after you've
>> killed the tuple, or you know you're not going to kill it.
>
> Where does row locking fit in there? - you may need to retry when that
> part is incorporated, of course. What if you have multiple promise
> tuples from a contended attempt to insert a single slot, or multiple
> broken promise tuples across multiple slots or even multiple commands
> in the same xact?
Yeah, it seems like PromiseTupleInsertionLockAcquire should be locking
the tuple, rather than the XID.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolas Barbier | 2014-01-02 12:59:09 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-01-02 12:45:29 | Re: Show lossy heap block info in EXPLAIN ANALYZE for bitmap heap scan |