Re: Locks on unlogged tables are locked?!

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Locks on unlogged tables are locked?!
Date: 2023-11-21 17:18:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ+ANgxnC7xUxsSzXSikDYG2KRSY2rQB-pZnGw6kwZaRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:49 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Uh, was this ever addressed? I don't see the patch applied or the code
> in this area modified.

I never saw this email originally, but I don't think I believe
Laurenz's argument. Are all AEL-requiring operations on unlogged
tables safe to perform on a standby without AEL? I believe I would be
quite surprised if that turned out to be true.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2023-11-21 17:19:38 Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c
Previous Message David Steele 2023-11-21 17:17:48 Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label