From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ryan Kelly <rpkelly22(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hstore parser incorrectly handles malformed input |
Date: | 2012-05-08 00:44:23 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYzuJ6noRk-amXVW1vXqVErWRf6_JzpunhgbSQ6nTz5bA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Ryan Kelly <rpkelly22(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> In my mind, all of these should have been rejected as erroneous input.
>>> To that end, I have attached a patch which causes all of these inputs
>>> to be rejected as invalid.
>
>> Hm, I would have expected all three of these to result in "a" having
>> an empty-string value. I see nothing in the hstore documentation
>> suggesting that I must write a=>"" or some such to get an empty value,
>
> Attached is an alternative patch that fixes it that way.
>
> Does anybody else have an opinion as to which of these solutions is
> more preferable? And should we regard this as a back-patchable bug
> fix, or a definition change suitable only for HEAD?
I vote for not back-patching, regardless of exactly what we decide to do here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ryan Kelly | 2012-05-08 01:15:40 | Re: BUG #6629: Creating a gist index fails with "too many LWLocks taken" |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-08 00:40:23 | Re: BUG #6624: Tab completion of identifier containing single backslash triggers warnings |