From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: heavly load system spec |
Date: | 2012-05-24 20:09:55 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYzt7gR3KWBBTM6RB0QUkBx++7ovz7qFUDnKLGFKaMCfg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I know this is a very general question. But if you guys had to specify
> system (could be one server or cluster), with sustainable transaction
> rate of 1.5M tps running postgresql, what configuration and hardware
> would you be looking for ?
> The transaction distribution there is 90% writes/updates and 10% reads.
> We're talking 64 linux, Intel/IBM system.
>
> I'm trying to see how that compares with Oracle system.
1.5 million is a lot of tps, especially if some of them are write
transactions. On trivial read-only transactions (primary key lookup
on fully cached table), using a 16-core, 64-thread IBM POWER7 box,
pgbench -M prepared -S -n -T 60 -c 64 -j 64:
tps = 455903.743918 (including connections establishing)
tps = 456012.871764 (excluding connections establishing)
That box isn't quite the fastest one I've seen, but it's close.
What hardware is Oracle running on?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2012-05-24 21:04:05 | Re: heavly load system spec |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2012-05-24 17:09:12 | Re: High load average in 64-core server , no I/O wait and CPU is idle |