Re: xlog location arithmetic

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic
Date: 2011-12-23 15:13:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYzjg8KTurHxmTLt_f5X4BQDQaPcH-MuPGvim3Kn=kt1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I too think a datatype is overkill, if we're only planning on providing
> one function.

Are there any other functions we ought to provide?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-12-23 15:13:42 Re: xlog location arithmetic
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-23 15:05:54 Re: xlog location arithmetic