From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Hamid Quddus <hamid(dot)quddus(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: AlterUserStmt anmd RoleSpec rules in grammar.y |
Date: | 2017-07-29 00:56:47 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYzjJP3rNWvU5YAGUVD4FZgL6ydTZ2YbErZEZH7+5UmPQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> wrote:
> One more notice. ALTER USER ALL works in EnterpriseDB 10beta2
> installer. That's weird. I thought EnterpriseDB uses official sources.
I find it really hard to believe that we're doing anything else. It
wouldn't make any sense to patch the PostgreSQL source code and then
release the installers as PostgreSQL installers. And if we *were*
going to do that, wouldn't we patch something more interesting than
the ALTER USER command? I don't know what's going on here but I have
a feeling that EnterpriseDB secretly maintaining patch sets that we
inject into our PostgreSQL installers is not that thing.
Adding a few EDB people.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-07-29 01:08:36 | Re: In-place index updates and HOT (Was: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)) |
Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-07-29 00:42:08 | [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently |