| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: procost for to_tsvector |
| Date: | 2015-05-01 14:03:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYzi9S-g3zndia0DDz7EUibbXqsTTxaJSTQRsXzYYAbPw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Andrew did the research to support a higher value, but even 10 should
>> be an improvement over what we have now.
>
> Yes, I saw that, but I didn't see him recommend an actual number. Can
> someone recommend a number now? Tom initially recommended 10, but
> Andrew's tests suggest something > 100. Tom didn't do any tests so I
> tend to favor Andrew's suggestion, if he has one.
In the OP, he suggested "on the order of 100". Maybe we could just go with 100.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-01 14:03:15 | Re: initdb -S and tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-01 14:01:45 | Re: procost for to_tsvector |