| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |
| Date: | 2012-03-16 14:08:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYzYaEb2V+XYrZ1ZURG0Z+WC-UwJ5RTAPfOMSaTPO8A5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
>> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
>> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
>> > backwards.
>>
>> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
>
> I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
> commit this for 9.2.
Is anyone even working on testing it?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-16 14:20:31 | Re: Syntax error and reserved keywords |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-16 14:01:42 | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |