Re: Publish autovacuum informations

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Publish autovacuum informations
Date: 2014-12-31 16:19:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYxtr1rOHSaxn43MUqrwPqZcXVjnkR3fq8SK6cG4BjJKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Either one of those approaches would cripple our freedom to change those
> data structures; which we've done repeatedly in the past and will surely
> want to do again. So I'm pretty much -1 on exposing them.

We could instead add a view of this information to core --
pg_stat_autovacuum, or whatever.

But to be honest, I'm more in favor of Guillaume's proposal. I will
repeat my recent assertion that we -- you in particular -- are too
reluctant to expose internal data structures to authors of C
extensions, and that this is developer-hostile.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-12-31 16:21:55 Re: Failure on markhor with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS for test brin
Previous Message Thom Brown 2014-12-31 16:16:20 Re: Parallel Seq Scan