| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility |
| Date: | 2016-06-27 21:57:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYvroXPe2YMAvL_wOs4uuBwG=G2ZO6+1f-ZbFEfOMNdwQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> While looking at the module I found two mistakes in the docs:
>> pg_visibility_map and pg_visibility *not* taking in input a block
>> number are SRFs, and return a set of records. The documentation is
>> just listing them with "returns record". A patch is attached.
>
> And that: s/PD_ALL_VISIBILE/PD_ALL_VISIBLE.
Committed. Thanks for the careful proofreading.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-27 22:04:23 | Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-27 21:56:43 | Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility |