Re: making EXPLAIN extensible

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
Date: 2025-03-18 18:46:16
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYvnNnzEOXJTxG+ivFNaMD-FSKpVe8UiUAPNayQurHjQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 2:40 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> FWIW, I am fairly strongly against that. Every extension author is
> going to feel that their information is so important it should come
> first. Other people might have a different opinion about that, and
> in any case they can't all be first.

Yep.

> There's certainly room for bikeshedding here, but I think it'd be good
> to get some actual experience before redesigning what you've done.

I think so, too, although obviously I'm biased.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-03-18 18:49:05 Re: Add -k/--link option to pg_combinebackup
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-03-18 18:45:28 Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0