From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claire Giordano <Claire(dot)Giordano(at)microsoft(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: code contributions for 2024, WIP version |
Date: | 2024-12-03 16:41:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYvW06BqqSpVDW73d5AUVtzAwsJgGGSNjopvy38NXpq0Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 11:19 AM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> While I know you said "you will do you" when it comes to your annual
> blog, there are a number of similar efforts -- top of mind is the
> analysis done (as I understand it) by Daniel Gustafsson and Claire
> Giordano [1], as well as ongoing/recurring analysis done by the
> contributor committee. And there is the adjacent related discussion
> around commit messages/authors. It makes me wonder if there isn't a way
> to make all of our lives easier going forward.
Yes, I'm game to try to figure out how to combine our efforts. I don't
think it's a bad thing that different people have different takes;
this is complicated and looking at it through just one lens is
limiting. But people duplicating work is, well, not so good.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-12-03 17:04:49 | Re: crash with synchronized_standby_slots |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-12-03 16:39:43 | checksum verification code breaks backups in v16- |