Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans
Date: 2014-03-18 20:28:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYudFd7XDyL6bV-XBG=nW+WJnb0W0fQXzjGBVsvSVWcFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm glad you're looking at this, but we're in the final throws of
>> nailing down 9.4 and I don't have anticipate I'll have time to look at
>> it in the near future. You should add it here so we don't forget
>> about it:
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
> Yeah, no worries--you guys are busy enough as it is. As far as adding
> it to the commitfest goes, I did, actually. Should I add the comment
> with the testcase as well? I'm investigating further and it's looking
> to me like what I'm really up against is O(n^2) behavior in the
> optimizer for OR clauses, but I'll keep looking--don't want to say
> anything too prematurely.
>>
>> And you might also check this:
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
>>
> Also read that--did I do something wrong? I tried to make sure I
> followed its guidelines. Anyway, thanks for the response :)

No, I think you wrote a nice email, and I didn't think you did
anything wrong. It was mostly just a form letter to say, hey, this
looks interesting. Glad you were already aware of the resources.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-03-18 20:29:10 Re: Wiki Page Draft for upcoming release
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-03-18 20:19:01 Re: Wiki Page Draft for upcoming release