From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: RLS Design |
Date: | 2014-06-25 15:44:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYu1YOGyodfNscJBw5NrLHpE-xmJ=Urfjj+7vMyy4R5dw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Let's try to outline what this would look like then.
>
> Taking your approach, we'd have:
>
> CREATE POLICY p1;
> CREATE POLICY p2;
>
> ALTER TABLE t1 SET POLICY p1 TO t1_p1_quals;
> ALTER TABLE t1 SET POLICY p2 TO t1_p2_quals;
This seems like a very nice, flexible framework.
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE t1 TO role1 USING p1;
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE t1 TO role2 USING p2;
Instead of doing it this way, we could instead do:
ALTER ROLE role1 ADD POLICY p1;
ALTER ROLE role2 ADD POLICY p2;
We could possibly allow multiple policies to be set for the same user,
but given an error (or OR the quals together) if there are conflicting
policies for the same table. A user with no policies would see
everything to which they've been granted access.
To support different policies on different operations, you could have
something like:
ALTER TABLE t1 SET POLICY p1 ON INSERT TO t1_p1_quals;
Without the ON clause, it would establish the given policy for all operations.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-25 15:46:50 | Re: makeAndExpr(), etc. confined to gram.y? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-25 15:40:47 | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |