Re: Misidentification of Python shared library

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Misidentification of Python shared library
Date: 2016-10-04 16:06:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYu0yPYz-ZT9J6DQh6MAbbR6eHVeq==nLMSCV7Shh=y7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "$python_libdir /usr/lib64 /usr/lib" (too bad there's no easy
> platform-independent way to find out the linker's default search path).

"too bad" sounds like a grave understatement of the perils involved
using a fixed list of paths which may or may not bear any resemblance
at all to what the platform actually uses.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2016-10-04 16:06:48 Re: Logical tape pause/resume
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-04 16:01:20 Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?