Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date: 2017-06-09 16:19:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYtE_9qVkd4SNsFo8hfDcHyk2eW1zWe7jaDyAd6F+aT=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> [Adding Andrew Gierth]
>
> Here is a rebased version of the patch to fix transition tables with
> inheritance. Fixes a typo in an error message ("not support on
> partitions" -> "... supported ..."), and changes regression test
> triggers to be single-event (only one of INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE),
> because a later patch will not allow multi-event triggers with TTs.
>
> This is patch 1 of a stack of 3 patches addressing currently known
> problems with transition tables.

So, Andrew, are you running with this, or should I keep looking into it?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-06-09 16:47:29 Re: partial aggregation with internal state type
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-06-09 16:18:53 Re: strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings