Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Regina Obe <r(at)pcorp(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date: 2023-08-01 18:45:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYsrqDQOeD0D=yY72X4QC-3+XPDsXXGrtsuSAE72Uv2gQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:24 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> returned with feedback. Please feel free to resubmit to a future CF when there
> is a new version of the patch.

Isn't the real problem here that there's no consensus on what to do?
Or to put a finer point on it, that Tom seems adamantly opposed to any
design that would solve the problem the patch authors are worried
about?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-01 19:23:14 Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2023-08-01 18:28:27 Re: add timing information to pg_upgrade