Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-21 17:13:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYsSf14XxKOfLGNd7mJNWH74cRJ1kt=nWnTDKNgOZ487g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/21/11 10:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Yeah, I get it.  But I think standby would confuse them, too, just in
>>>> a different set of situations.
>>>
>>> Other than PITR, what situations?
>>
>> Hot backup?
>
> Hot backup == PITR.   You're just not bothering to accumulate WAL logs.

Well, I don't think of it that way, but YMMV, of course.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2011-09-21 17:15:04 Re: sequence locking
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-21 17:11:00 Re: [PERFORM] Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions