| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] pg_basebackup blocking all queries with horrible performance |
| Date: | 2012-06-20 18:18:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYrrx32Qg5BuLFAh+jUrWbLWcZMDg0jgU-Z3BGTKPqg=w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> You agreed to add something like NOSYNC option into START_REPLICATION command?
>>>
>>> I'm on the fence. I was hoping somebody else would chime in with an
>>> opinion as well.
>>
>> +1
>
> Nobody else with any opinion on this? :(
I don't think we really need a NOSYNC flag at this point. Just not
setting the flush location in clients that make a point of flushing in
a timely fashion seems fine.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | wangqi | 2012-06-21 03:38:31 | about shared_buffer and kernel.shmmax |
| Previous Message | Misa Simic | 2012-06-20 16:01:40 | Re: View as front-end to function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-06-20 18:20:21 | Re: Nasty, propagating POLA violation in COPY CSV HEADER |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-20 18:16:16 | Re: Pg default's verbosity? |