Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column
Date: 2024-06-08 18:09:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYrh0bYnyyq9pVp32yH2FLAD5BVUx3biq15aQbioNaBFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 10:02 AM Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Therefore, I think the current patch offers a better version of the \du command.
> However, I admit that these improvements are not enough to accept the patch.
> I would like to hear other opinions.

Hmm, I don't think I quite agree with this. If people like this
version better than what we have now, that's all we need to accept the
patch. I just don't really want to be the one to decide all by myself
whether this is, in fact, better. So, like you, I would like to hear
other opinions.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Vatsa 2024-06-08 18:38:48 Re: Proposal to include --exclude-extension Flag in pg_dump
Previous Message Pavel Luzanov 2024-06-08 14:02:16 Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column