Re: Core Extensions relocation

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>> None of those others perform such a role.  Instead they add additional
>> functionality intended to be utilised as part of general data usage,
>> adding new types, operators, query functions etc.  Maybe the term
>> "core" is inappropriate.  Instead we might wish to refer to them as
>> "utility extensions" or something like that, although that may be just
>> as vague.
>
> The term “core” here intends to show off that those extensions are
> maintained by the core PostgreSQL developer team. If needs be, those
> extensions will get updated in minor releases (crash, bugs, security,
> etc).

Everything in contrib meets that definition, more or less.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company