| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commit fest 2013-11 final report |
| Date: | 2013-12-18 12:07:16 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYr0dE-PtpfH4yjH1YzKbtLVcF_Y155g=+ph6YAvC1bDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward
>> to the next fest, so we don't forget about them?
>
> This was done the last few times, but it has caused some controversy.
> One problem was that a number of patches arrived in this commit fest
> without either the author or the reviewers knowing about it, which
> caused the already somewhat stale patch to become completely abandoned.
>
> I think what I'll do is send an email to each of the affected patch
> threads describing the situation. But I'd like someone involved in the
> patch, either author or reviewer, to make the final call about moving
> the patch forward.
+1. And thanks for your work on this CommitFest.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-12-18 12:38:26 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2013-12-18 12:02:05 | Re: PoC: Partial sort |