Re: [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Rader, David" <davidr(at)openscg(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?
Date: 2017-03-07 15:59:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYqKbyN3YrvWu7+vKYRFVKf-8NAw4CqsDVBAw-CbApBwg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Rader, David <davidr(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
> Revised doc patch attached with various parameters.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-07 16:01:25 Re: BUG #14580: pgbench bug
Previous Message stepya 2017-03-07 14:12:01 BUG #14581: invalid cache ID: 41 CONTEXT: parallel worker

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-07 16:04:04 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-03-07 15:53:56 Re: Reporting planning time with EXPLAIN