From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
Date: | 2020-06-22 15:17:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYq2Jfqfs09cTmwbv0eHcj0c5hrDL8wiiFZYOWp3uL+oA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:06 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> This was addressed in 92c58fd94801dd5c81ee20e26c5bb71ad64552a8
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items&diff=34994&oldid=34993
I mean, that's fine, but I am trying to make a more general point
about priorities. Getting the GUCs right is a lot less important than
getting the feature right.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Estes | 2020-06-22 16:48:55 | Summary of DDL/DML statement return/output values? |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-06-22 15:06:30 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-06-22 15:17:47 | Assertion failure in pg_copy_logical_replication_slot() |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-06-22 15:13:20 | Re: suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort |