Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation
Date: 2017-06-17 17:41:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYpC+3cQeaD_tSd63RuvYoNtPVDo18V02g6PeUa+d1FDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really
> seriously against that?

Is it under the same license as everything else?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-06-17 19:13:43 Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-06-17 17:38:29 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128