| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization) |
| Date: | 2014-08-06 20:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYorYFaQQZ5FWqYS0rp5mtC=cvMr4mBgTnVAg1PXSuFOg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Per your other email, here's the patch again; hopefully I've got the
>> right stuff in the file this time.
>
> Your patch looks fine to me. I recommend committing patch 1 with these
> additions. I can't think of any reason to rehash the 2012 discussion.
I've committed the patch I posted yesterday. I did not see a good
reason to meld that together in a single commit with the first of the
patches you posted; I'll leave you to revise that patch to conform
with this approach.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-06 20:14:23 | Re: missing PG_RETURN_UINT16 |
| Previous Message | James Cloos | 2014-08-06 20:07:07 | Re: PostrgeSQL vs oracle doing 1 million sqrts am I doing it wrong? |