From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regression tests fail once XID counter exceeds 2 billion |
Date: | 2011-11-14 17:39:43 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYoBNQPdKLnVsJpdESgm_KwOrQOpV8x3rMS_thL0WGb7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> While investigating bug #6291 I was somewhat surprised to discover
> $SUBJECT. The cause turns out to be this kluge in alter_table.sql:
>
> select virtualtransaction
> from pg_locks
> where transactionid = txid_current()::integer
>
> which of course starts to fail with "integer out of range" as soon as
> txid_current() gets past 2^31. Right now, since there is no cast
> between xid and any integer type, and no comparison operator except the
> dubious xideqint4 one, the only way we could fix this is something
> like
>
> where transactionid::text = (txid_current() % (2^32))::text
>
> which is surely pretty ugly. Is it worth doing something less ugly?
> I'm not sure if there are any other use-cases for this type of
> comparison, but if there are, seems like it would be sensible to invent
> a function along the lines of
>
> txid_from_xid(xid) returns bigint
>
> that plasters on the appropriate epoch value for an
> assumed-to-be-current-or-recent xid, and returns something that squares
> with the txid_snapshot functions. Then the test could be coded without
> kluges as
>
> where txid_from_xid(transactionid) = txid_current()
>
> Thoughts?
Well, the mod-2^32 arithmetic doesn't bother me, but if you're feeling
motivated to invent txid_from_xid() I think that would be fine, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2011-11-14 17:48:23 | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-14 17:32:57 | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |