| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Akshat Jaimini <destrex271(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallelize correlated subqueries that execute within each worker |
| Date: | 2024-01-23 20:20:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYnezZ0MrtNt-fevG83PnZhM5xMeQPG9xWpys8WONRk7g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Akshat Jaimini <destrex271(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello!
> I was going through the previous conversations for this particular patch and it seems that this patch failed some tests previously?
> Imo we should move it to the next CF so that the remaining issues can be resolved accordingly.
So I guess the question here is whether this is thought to be ready
for serious review or whether it is still thought to need work. If the
latter, it should be marked RwF until that happens -- if the former,
then we should try to review it rather than letting it languish
forever.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-01-23 20:22:58 | Re: Optimizing nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, allowing multi-column ordered scans, skip scan |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-01-23 20:15:12 | Re: the s_lock_stuck on perform_spin_delay |