| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch |
| Date: | 2015-02-23 00:39:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYnZUeHenALQZ+iJMcVvsS_A0VpzkGz3hOL=ZMX1FkykQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:48:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>> > I've attached a new version of the patch fixing the missing closedir on
>> > readdir error.
>>
>> If readir() fails and closedir() succeeds, the return will be -1 but
>> errno will be 0.
>
> Out of curiosity, have you seen a closedir() implementation behave that way?
> It would violate C99 ("The value of errno is zero at program startup, but is
> never set to zero by any library function.") and POSIX.
No. Good point, I didn't think about that. I think this way is safer, though.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-23 00:53:33 | Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-02-23 00:35:28 | Re: Allow "snapshot too old" error, to prevent bloat |