Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> The procgloballist stuff should be the subject of a separate patch
>> which I agree with.
>
> Yes, I think that's probably a net improvement in robustness quite
> apart from what we decide to do about any of the rest of this. I've
> attached it here as revise-procglobal-tracking.patch and will commit
> that bit if nobody objects.

In reviewing this thread I realized that I never got around to
committing this bit. And it still seems like a good idea, so I've
done that now.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company