Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- new wording

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- new wording
Date: 2016-09-15 17:57:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYmGmUfq4fv4SL-FN83cNrVNLMw986qmHErtohoquWtjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Common annoyances fixed:
> * vacuum freeze on large tables
> * long-lived snapshots holding back vacuum
> * idle in transaction timeout

Saying we've fixed the second one is stretching the truth to the
breaking point. old_snapshot_threshold is a good tool for mitigating
that problem for some users, but it's not like it's just "fixed".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2016-09-16 00:17:47 Yandex, Oracle, and Hacker news
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2016-09-15 17:18:15 Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- new wording