| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |
| Date: | 2022-07-29 16:55:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYm6n-jmt8YJ17OmZLQje7umrNF-q37xOJL1aac2=SdKQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I'm just uncertain whether what Amit has implemented is the
> > least-annoying way to go about it... any thoughts on that,
> > specifically as it pertains to this patch?
>
> I haven't looked at this patch at all. I'll try to make some
> time for it, but probably not today.
OK, thanks. The preliminary patch I'm talking about here is pretty
short, so you could probably look at that part of it, at least, in
some relatively small amount of time. And I think it's also in pretty
reasonable shape apart from this issue. But, as usual, there's the
question of how well one can evaluate a preliminary patch without
reviewing the full patch in detail.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-07-29 16:57:08 | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Patch Triage: Needs Review, Part 1 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-07-29 16:52:50 | Re: Temporary file access API |