Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
Date: 2016-05-03 15:04:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYm-+6=dfjHJCO9DqshhjK8GhcUSUH=RQ+-sqzj3oZTZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Craig Ringer (craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> On 3 May 2016 at 19:04, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > With commit a9f0e8e5a2e779a888988cb64479a6723f668c84, now pg_dump, use a
>> > bitmap
>> > to represent what to include. With this commit if non-super user is unable
>> > to perform the dump.
>> >
>>
>> Hm. I think we need a src/bin/pg_dump/t/ test for the TAP suite for this
>> one, because something this fundamental should really have blown the
>> buildfarm up when committed.
>
> I'm in the process of building a pretty comprehensive set, as discussed
> in another thread.

Are you going to review and commit this patch?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-03 15:07:40 Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-03 15:04:49 Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user