From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs) |
Date: | 2016-02-03 22:56:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYkmr-=0SxoHVOaNo1TjmKi_k636tjL2X=q+7vSxhHR-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> PFA patches with naming conventions similar to previous ones.
> pg_fdw_core_v7.patch: core changes
> pg_fdw_join_v7.patch: postgres_fdw changes for join pushdown
> pg_join_pd_v7.patch: combined patch for ease of testing.
Hmm, I think that GetPathForEPQRecheck() is a pretty terrible name.
How about GetExistingJoinPath()?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-03 23:00:03 | Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-03 22:52:14 | Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived |