Re: new heapcheck contrib module

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date: 2021-02-05 21:13:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYki27-uebuieGirYLe+4k4Jw6aQQjw=YoZbKd229jmsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:10 AM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Numbered 0001 in this next patch set.

Hi,

I committed 0001 as you had it and 0002 with some more cleanups. Things I did:

- Adjusted some comments.
- Changed processQueryResult so that it didn't do foo(bar) with foo
being a pointer. Generally we prefer (*foo)(bar) when it can be
confused with a direct function call, but wunk->foo(bar) is also
considered acceptable.
- Changed the return type of ParallelSlotResultHandler to be bool,
because having it return PGresult * seemed to offer no advantages.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2021-02-05 21:22:34 Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-02-05 21:05:43 Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better