From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enforcing that all WAL has been replayed after restoring from backup |
Date: | 2011-08-10 17:46:50 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYkX=dYJVkrnXLPo8moik-BbrJin-8n7w5RQeU-vN74CA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Hmm, that's not possible for the 'tar' output, but would work for 'dir'
>> output. Another similar idea would be to withhold the control file in
>> memory until the end of backup, and append it to the output as last. The
>> backup can't be restored until the control file is written out.
>
>> That won't protect from more complicated scenarios, like if you take the
>> backup without the -x flag, and copy some but not all of the required
>> WAL files manually to the pg_xlog directory. But it'd be much better
>> than nothing for 9.1.
>
> Maybe we're overcomplicating this. What about changing pg_basebackup to
> print a message when the backup is completely sent/received? People
> would get used to that quickly, and would know to be suspicious if they
> didn't see it.
Yeah, but would they be sufficiently suspicious to think "oh, my
backup is hopeless corrupted even if it seems to work"?
I think a clearer warning is needed, at the very least, and if there's
a way to prevent it altogether at least in straightforward cases, that
would be even better.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-08-10 17:48:20 | Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-10 17:45:28 | Re: Enforcing that all WAL has been replayed after restoring from backup |